Skip to content


Spinal Clearance

4 comments

Jems.com has an article published yesterday concerning a study relating spinal clearance and HEMS.

The study is entitled “Clinical Clearance of Spinal Immobilization in the Air Medical Environment: A Feasibility Study.” This study was published in the Journal of Trauma and thus I do not have access to the entire data set.

What I do have access to is a knowledge base of common sense.

Honestly, the fact that this is even being considered is moronic at best. If someone is stable enough to be cleared from spinal precautions in flight by HEMS crews, they had no business putting them in the aircraft to start.

Further, doing a spinal clearance exam in the back of a helicopter which is 1/3 the size of an ambulance is completely insane.

I think this study proves how irresponsible we are being with HEMS. We aren’t just wasting money(and a lot of it), we are risking lives. The use of HEMS in many settings is debatable enough in itself, we need not compromise logic altogether in the use of HEMS.

I admit that many flight crews are better medics than I am. I’ll also admit that I’ve met enough flight crews that were mediocre at best and scary or dangerous sometimes, to know that being a flight medic does not mean you are a good medic.

No one ever considered doing this on the ground and there are plenty of ground crews out there with the same or more Critical Care training than flight crews. My Internship was with a service that ran Critical Care trucks that had a Nurse/Medic crew and I promise that they never considered doing a spinal clearance exam in the field.

Be smart out there. Watch your back and do what you KNOW is best for the patient. Sometimes that means bucking the line, and sometimes that means fighting a system hell bent on making the most money possible.

Good Luck, Godspeed, be safe.

  • Anonymous

    You pose a very interesting point, and I agree with you.I cant seem to find the study now, but Wilderness and street EMT-Bs (and Medics) in some parts of the country are learning spinal clearance protocols. All EMT-Bs in Maine and New Hampshire have it, as well as BostonEMS. The clearance is contraindicated if there was any LOC, any distracting injuries, no drugs/alcohol on board, and no pain after 3+ palpations up and down the neck and spine.The study I am citing find no case where spinal injury was cleared inappropriately (per protocol), period. While on principal, I dont agree with brand new EMTs with 110 hours of class determining that there is no spinal injury after MVAs, the protocols are helpful for LOLs in NAD after ground-level falls. Finally, I agree that possibly spinal clearance should be key in new HEMS dispatch protocols. Be Safe yourself,DS

  • Rogue Medic

    Interesting article by Dr. Wesley. Usually he is much more sensible than this. I wrote about this in < HREF="http://roguemedic.blogspot.com/2008/10/whiskey-tango-foxtrot-research.html" REL="nofollow">Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Research<>. I will be adding some posts on the lack of evidence supporting spinal immobilization.

  • Pingback: How to get rid of blackheads

  • Pingback: street fighter online multiplayer